Potential identifiers include obvious ones like name and social security number, and also:
Under HIPAA's "safe harbor" standard, information is considered de-identified if all of the above have been removed, and there is no reasonable basis to believe that the remaining information could be used to identify a person.
An assessment of whether or not a study represents good science. For example a study with scientific merit addresses an area of importance to the discipline, utilizes established scientific principles, exhibits alignment within the study, offers congruence among research questions and study design, and is likely to contribute to scientific knowledge.
An essential document that records all individuals who entered the screening process. The screening log demonstrates the investigator’s attempt to enroll a representative sample of participants.
A process designed to determine individual’s eligibility for participation in a clinical research study.
Secondary data is data collected by someone other than the user. Common sources of secondary data for social science include censuses, surveys, organizational records and data collected through qualitative methodologies or qualitative research. Primary data, by contrast, are collected by the investigator conducting the research.
Any information which could be of interest to the court in civil, criminal or other judicial proceedings. Most commonly this includes the use of alcohol, illegal drugs or addictive products and illegal behavior. Other examples which may in some instances be of interest to the court include information regarding HIV, AIDS, and other STDs; sexual practices or preferences; the participant's psychological state or mental health; information that can be linked to a participant's financial standing, employability or reputation within the community or that might lead to social disgrace or prejudice; genetic information or identifiable biological samples and corresponding data that may be used to demonstrate predisposition to disease or disputes in paternity; or information regarding behavioral interventions.
Any adverse event that:
Is another condition which investigators judge to represent significant hazards
Any behavior, action or omission in the conduct or oversight of human research that has been determined to:
Examples include, but are not limited to the following:
Any undesired action or effect of a drug or treatment. Negative or adverse effects may include headache, nausea, hair loss, skin irritation, or other physical problems. Experimental drugs must be evaluated for both immediate and long-term side effects.
A device that presents a potential for serious risk to the health, safety, or welfare of a subject and:
Original documents, data, and records (e.g., hospital records, clinical and office charts, laboratory notes, memoranda, participant diaries, recorded data from automated instruments, x-rays, etc.) that are used in a clinical trial.
A guardian of a person of limited capacity, including, without limitation, such a guardian who is appointed because a person of limited capacity has voluntarily petitioned for the appointment and the court has determined that the person has the requisite capacity to make such a petition.
A person, federal agency, corporation, or other entity that provides funds for a research project.
An individual who both initiates and actually conducts - alone or with others - a clinical investigation. Corporations, agencies, or other institutions do not qualify as Sponsor-Investigators.
Detailed written instructions to achieve uniformity of the performance of a specific function across studies and patients at an individual site.
A treatment or regimen in wide use and considered to be effective in the treatment of a specific disease or condition. (Often used as comparator for a new drug, device, biologic or treatment).
Established safety criteria that would either pause or halt a study due to reasons including but not limited to futility or risk(s) to the participants.
Any of the treatment groups in a randomized trial. Most randomized trials have two “arms” but some have three or more.
Consent for an individual to participate in research given by an appropriate surrogate (e.g., next of kin including spouse, parent, child, sibling) when an individual is assessed as not capable of providing fully informed and legally effective consent.
A means to obtain information from respondents through written questionnaires, telephone interviews, door-to-door canvassing, or similar procedures.
A determination by the IRB Chair, a designated IRB member, or the convened IRB to temporarily interrupt some or all previously-approved research activities. The suspended activities could include, but not be limited to, recruiting and enrolling new subjects. Suspended studies remain open and require continuing review. NOTE: Suspensions of IRB approval apply to interruptions in research activities due to concerns about the safety, rights, or welfare of human research subjects or others. They do not include interruptions in human research resulting solely from the expiration of the IRB approval period.